iPhone 3G w/iOS4 - slow & very buggy

Ever since I updated my iPhone 3G to iOS4, I have noticed extreme lagging on most apps, especially iBooks.  I don't even use iBooks, as it takes forever to just load the app, and when you have books or PDF's, it even takes longer.  It seems like the app uses to much CPU and memory, though I have not researched this, just wanted to complain about it.

Also, has anyone else noticed a weird bug in the Mail App?  When I archive all my emails through the web browser (Gmail), it still shows I have email (weird placement emails with some weird dates) on my iPhone, even though I have no emails in my inbox in Gmail.  The emails have no subjects or content, and have some weird dates associated with them (see pics). Restarting the iPhone helps with slowness & lagging, though, it always seems to continue after a few days of use.  I don't even use my iPhone much anymore, since I'm always in front of a computer (another post), and my experince with iOS4, makes it even worse.

All very strange, and I'm not the only one who has experienced this (see links).  Rob, a co-worker, has confirmed the same bugs on his iPhone 3G, I wonder if it's specific to 3G phones.  God forbid, they're still iPhone 3G owners out there!


       

 

Apple to hold special iPhone 4 press conference on Friday

Apple on Wednesday invited select press to a special press conference to be held this Friday in California.

Apple would only say that the press conference would be regarding the iPhone 4. No other information was available when I spoke with them tonight.

 

Apple PR: Steve Jobs iPhone 4 "conversation" is a fake

Apple's CEO did not tell an angry customer "calm down," "retire," "it's just a phone"

Source: Boy Genius Report

An e-mail exchange being attributed to Steve Jobs is a fake, and was not written by him, according to Apple (AAPL) public relations.

The conversation was published Thursday by The Boy Genius Report and linked to by more than three dozen other sites. In it, a writer pretending to be Apple's CEO tries several times to mollify a customer called "Tom" who is furious about the iPhone 4's widely reported signal attenuation problem. In separate e-mail messages Jobs purportedly tells "Tom," who grows angrier with each exchange...

  • "No, you are getting all worked up over a few days of rumors. Calm down."
  • "You are most likely in an area with very low signal strength."
  • "You may be working from bad data. Not your fault. Stay tuned. We are working on it."
  • "Retire, relax, enjoy your family. It is just a phone. Not worth it." (In the latest version of the BGR report, this last line is now, bizarrely, attributed to "Tom")

Asked on the record whether Steve Jobs was the author of any or all of these statements, a top Apple spokesman emphatically denied it.

Separately, AppleInsider is reporting that a similar exchange was shopped to them two days earlier by a Virginia man who offered to sell it to them for an unspecified amount of money.

 

Daring Fireball: iPhone 4 3G Data Performance

After reading Andy Ihnatko’s iPhone 4 review, I was intrigued by his comments regarding the phone’s significantly faster 3G data performance, with improved HSDPA (download) support and brand-new support for HSUPA (upload). So I ran some tests using the FCC’s free mobile broadband test app.

I tested three devices: an iPhone 4, and iPhone 3GS, and an iPad 3G. I ran three tests on each, and the numbers below are the average of three runs. (There wasn’t much variance in the results.)

Download
(Mbps)
Upload
(Mbps)
Latency
(ms)
iPhone 4 2.38 1.26 234
iPhone 4 (handheld) 1.61 1.18 235
iPad 3G 1.34 0.14 1254
iPhone 3GS 1.22 0.09 2119
iPhone 4 (Wi-Fi) 13.43 4.33 65

 

I tested 3G performance on the iPhone 4 twice (three runs each) — once lying on a table, and once while held in my left hand, with my palm spanning the infamous lower-left antenna gap. I also tested it using my home 802.11n Wi-Fi network, connected to a Comcast cable modem.

So I’m seeing download speeds twice as fast as on an iPhone 3GS, and upload speeds over ten times faster. Latency is about an order of magnitude better as well. The iPad doesn’t fare much better than the 3GS.

Holding the iPhone 4 in my hand drops the 3G download speed by about a third, but it’s still faster than the 3GS. Upload speed and latency didn’t seem affected by holding it in my hand.

 

 

Apple Sells 1.7 Million iPhone 4 Handsets in Opening Weekend

Apple has sold an almost ridiculous 1.7 million iPhone 4 handsets in its opening weekend, running Thursday through Saturday. This breaks every prediction we saw last week, and almost triples the 600,000 pre-orders reported by Apple just a week before the new iPhone went on sale.

“This is the most successful product launch in Apple’s history,” said Steve Jobs in an Apple press release. Even so, pre-ordering glitches and flat-out supply shortages kept Apple from selling even more. Jobs again: “Even so, we apologize to those customers who were turned away because we did not have enough supply.”

The customer pays $200 (16 GB) or $300 (32 GB) for an iPhone 4, but Apple gets more than that from AT&T. To find out how much, let’s take the prices from the few countries where the handsets are sold unlocked — France, Canada and Britain. Converted into U.S. dollars, we get the following:

Taking into account that all Apple products get more expensive as they cross the Atlantic, we’ll be conservative and use the Canadian prices. Taking the mean of the two prices (and rounding them) we get $670 in U.S. dollars. Let’s multiply that by 1.7 million to get Apple’s total sales for the weekend (not counting the newly discounted iPhone 3G or the still-hot iPad). The number? $1,139,000,000, or well over a billion dollars. Not a bad start.

 

Daring Fireball: FaceTime and the iPod Touch

That FaceTime is currently only available when connected to Wi-Fi is, obviously, a limitation. But that it uses Wi-Fi — data, rather than voice networking — is an indication of just how big a deal it is. It’s the beginning of Apple’s end-run around the phone carriers.

You can switch to FaceTime from a call that started as a voice call, but as Dan Frommer reported at Business Insider this week, once you switch to FaceTime, you’re no longer using voice minutes. The voice call ends once the FaceTime connection is made.

More importantly, you don’t need to initiate a FaceTime call using a voice call. You can start the call using FaceTime directly, in which case the entire process takes place over IP networking. The advantage to starting with a voice call is that you’ll get a voice connection even if the recipient isn’t on Wi-Fi at the moment.

But consider the implications of the fact that you don’t need to start with a voice call. That means you don’t, in theory, need to start with a phone. A hypothetical camera-equipped iPod Touch could make FaceTime calls. So could a hypothetical camera-equipped iPad. Or even an Apple TV. This notion occurred to me during the WWDC keynote, when Steve Jobs said that Apple expected to ship “tens of millions of FaceTime devices” (emphasis added) this year alone.

If and when FaceTime is supported over 3G in addition to Wi-Fi, it’ll be data, not voice — megabytes, not minutes.

Today, a FaceTime-capable iPod Touch would not be a proper replacement for a phone. You could neither send nor receive calls when not connected to a Wi-Fi network, nor send or receive calls with anyone using a device that doesn’t support FaceTime. (The Wi-Fi limitation similarly anchors Skype-equipped iPod Touches today.)

But surely, someday, there will be a non-phone-carrier wireless networking technology with far greater range than Wi-Fi. FaceTime, I think, is a first step in the direction of a mobile “phone” with no mobile carrier. And immediately, starting today, it’s a step away from basing your iPhone’s “calls” from your carrier’s network.

 

New Mac Mini + iPhone 4

I don't need to tell you the iPhone 4 has arrived, but some of you may not know that Apple has released their new version of the Mac Mini.  I'm not going to attempt to explain why you should buy one, or the new features, just click here for the specs.


     

 

How smartphones are bogging down some wireless carriers

How smartphones are bogging down some wireless carriers

It's no secret that the iPhone has taxed AT&T's network in densely populated areas, especially New York and San Francisco. Reports of problems using iPhones at major tech conferences, like SXSWi, Macworld Expo, CES, and NAMM are not unusual. The iPhone's ease of use and focus on mobile media generally lead to higher data usage on average, but despite claims by AT&T Mobility CEO Ralph de la Vega, the amount of data being consumed is rarely the problem. The issue has to do with how modern smartphones—beginning with the iPhone—save power by disconnecting from the network whenever possible.

Even though AT&T has made improvements to its network over the last couple of years—including moving towers to an 850MHz spectrum that can more easily penetrate building walls, as well as upgrading to faster 7.2Mbps HSPA+ protocols—those improvements have done little to stem the tide of complaints from consumers in larger urban areas. Those users experience frequent dropped calls and an inability to make data connections, and in general they feel that service is spotty.

To make matters worse, AT&T has announced initiatives to add an even greater number of 3G data devices to its network, including Android smartphones, e-book readers, mobile data modems, and now the iPad. Even if consumers aren't yet concerned about the effect of the increasing number of devices on the network, the FCC sure is. 

"With the iPad pointing to even greater demand for mobile broadband on the horizon," wrote FCC director of scenario planning for Omnibus Broadband Initiative Phil Bellaria, "we must ensure that network congestion doesn't choke off a service that consumers clearly find so appealing or frustrate mobile broadband's ability to keep us competitive in the global broadband economy."

The fact that the US lags behind many other countries in both broadband capacity in general and wireless networks specifically is nothing new. But the fact that almost all of the complaints from iPhone users come from the US suggests that AT&T's network is at least partially to blame. In fact, users in other countries have told Ars that they don't experience the kinds of problems that US users often report. Well, other countries except one.

Several users in the UK, almost all in London, reported issues that were very similar to what we've heard from users in the US (and experienced ourselves): frequent dropped calls, lack of voice mail notifications, inability to make or receive calls even when the signal looks strong, and inability to make data connections. These problems were happening on the O2 network, which for several years was the UK's only iPhone carrier.

The carrier apologized to its customers late last year for the spotty service as it trumpeted network improvements meant to address the issues. An O2 employee contacted Ars to explain what caused the problem, and explained how newer smartphones are changing the assumptions that carriers use when configuring their network.

Good for the battery, but not so good for the network

The first problem that O2 encountered was that the iPhone uses more power saving features than previous smartphone designs. Most devices that use data do so in short bursts—a couple e-mails here, a tweet there, downloading a voicemail message, etc. Normally, devices that access the data network use an idling state that maintains the open data channel between the device and the network. However, to squeeze even more battery life from the iPhone, Apple configured the radio to simply drop the data connection as soon as any requested data is received. When the iPhone needs more data, it has to set up a new data connection.

The result is more efficient use of the battery, but it can cause problems with the signaling channels used to set up connections between a device and a cell node. Cell nodes use signaling channels to set up the data connection, as well as signaling phone calls, SMS messages, voicemails, and more. When enough iPhones are in a particular area, these signaling channels can become overloaded—there simply aren't enough to handle all the data requests along with all the calls and messages.

It's important to note, however, that this technique is not limited to the iPhone. Android and webOS devices also use a similar technique to increase battery life. While the iPhone was the first and currently most prolific device of this type, such smartphones are quickly becoming common, and represent the majority of growth in mobile phone sales in the past year.

Our source at O2 told us that network equipment that is configured to handle signaling traffic dynamically—shifting more spectrum to signaling channels when needed—can mitigate this problem. But even with more signaling capacity, network nodes may not be able to set up a data session, or may have problems getting a valid network address from an overloaded DHCP server. He said that data capacity is rarely the problem—nodes themselves can usually handle much more data than is flowing through them. However, the networks need to be configured to handle a growing number of devices connecting and disconnecting at a much higher rate than they've been accustomed to.

We spoke to another expert who works in the telecom field to find out why most European networks were not experiencing the problems that AT&T and O2 did. He told Ars that Europe embraced heavy text messaging and data use far earlier than users in the US. SMS and MMS messages rely heavily on signaling channels to operate, and so networks were generally configured to dynamically manage changes in signaling traffic.

O2 worked with its network equipment vendors to identify the problems and adjust the configuration to adapt to the changing needs of its smartphone users. For its part, AT&T has announced publicly that it is increasing backhaul capacity by running fiber to its cell sites, and plans an additional investment in network infrastructure—including adding up to 2,000 additional towers this year. The company would not comment on its efforts to address the kinds of issues described by our source at O2, though we know that O2 shared what it learned with AT&T and other carriers.

Apple has also stated that it is confident that AT&T can handle the additional network demands that the iPad would add to the growing tide of smartphone traffic. "As you know, AT&T has acknowledged that they are having some issues in a few cities and they have very detailed plans to address these," Apple COO Tim Cook said during the most recent quarterly earnings call. "We have personally reviewed these plans and we have very high confidence that they will make significant progress towards fixing them."

 

The worlds most expensive iPhone | 7x7Diamonds

iPhone 3GS SUPREME is priced at £1.92 million, 10 months in the making, the whole casing was created with 271 grams of 22ct solid gold

iphone 3GS SUPREME

The front bezel houses 136 flawless diamonds colour F ,which total to a massive 68 cts . The rear logo in solid gold has 53 flawless diamonds amounting to 1ct and the front navigation button is home to a single cut very rare diamond at 7.1 cts. The chest which houses this unique handset is made from a single block of Granite , in Kashmir gold with the inner lined with Nubuck top grain leather, which weight is a massive 7kg.

It was crafted by Katherine Hughes.

crazy